Talk:Axioms of socionics

Make sure you cite the source of this text and provide a link to the original (we need to do this with the Stratievskaya descriptions, too). Is this Prokofyeva? (Admin 12:25, 9 June 2007 (CDT))

I don't know who is, but that article seemed very academic to me. Machintruc 12:31, 9 June 2007 (CDT)

Actually, axioms of socionics don't talk of statics/dynamics, but perception/judgement (integral/fractional). Machintruc 05:35, 10 June 2007 (CDT)

They meant static/dynamic, but they named it their own term ("integral/fractional"). (Admin 05:54, 10 June 2007 (CDT))

Sure ? J seems fractional to me because it describes movements (Fe and Te) and distances (Fi and Ti), as P seems integral because it describes properties (Se and Ne) and interactions (Si and Ni).

Dynamic example : Think of two rotating gears which are joint to each other and have contradictory rotation (Te). They integrate by interacting each other (Si).

Static example : Think of two balls at rest (Se) : a red ball and a blue ball. They can differentiate by a field between them : distance (Ti).

You see how I interpret fractional and integral, but I can be mistaken. Machintruc 06:50, 10 June 2007 (CDT)